Why is Villanova an underdog vs. Houston? NCAA history has the answer
A No. 2 seed has never defeated a No. 5 seed in a Regional final. Houston is a small favorite in San Antonio.
It’s not often Villanova is an underdog like they are for Saturday’s meeting with Houston, but it does happen. Vegas opened the Wildcats as 2-point ‘dogs shortly after it was determined that they would be playing fifth-seeded Houston, which has won six in a row and 12 of its last 13.
The Cougars also have covered their last six, usually pretty comfortably, and 11 of those last 13. They took out Arizona, the No. 1 seed in the South, on Thursday.
Famous Houston native and prolific sports bettor Jim “Mattress Mack” McIngvale had one question as he was studying for his next million-dollar wager. “Do Villanova fans travel well?” he asked.
» READ MORE: Villanova’s Jermaine Samuels passed a stern test against Michigan with flying colors | Mike Sielski
What is unusual, perhaps historic for us gambling nerds, is that Villanova is the first No. 2 seed to be the underdog to a No. 5 in a regional final. The sample size is small – four meetings in 37 years – but the results can be disconcerting for those on the Main Line.
A No. 5 has never lost to a No. 2 in the Elite 8. Seems like they struggle more with No. 12 seeds in the first round than second seeds with a berth to the Final Four at stake.
“The analytical models absolutely love Houston,” said Sam Garriock, trading manager for PointsBet. “KenPom has them as the No. 2 team in the country and while we don’t quite believe in them to that extent, they’ve been getting respect all season, as evidenced by closing just 2-point dogs against 1-seeded Arizona.”
» READ MORE: The Shot, the Spectrum, and the official who got it right: Christian Laettner’s moment, 30 years later
Here are the previous meetings in the Elite 8 between the Nos. 2-5 seeds, with special thanks to the college basketball page at SportsReference.com for its help with the point spreads:
In 2019, No. 5 Auburn (4.5-point underdogs) beat No. 2 Kentucky in overtime.
In 2010, No. 5 Butler (+4) took care of No. 2 Kansas State.
In 2005, No. 5 Michigan State (+1.5) got by No. 2 Kentucky in double overtime.
In 1996, No. 5 Mississippi State (+4.5) upset No. 2 Cincinnati.
As Garriock mentioned, Houston (32-5) is second in Ken Pomeroy’s analytics. Villanova (29-7) is 11th.
“Houston is the classic example of a team who is underrated,” Garriock continued. “They destroyed a schedule that is relatively weak, with a scoring margin that is better than their record suggests.”
» READ MORE: Villanova takes out Michigan, 63-55, to advance to the Elite Eight
Cunning Mack
Not surprisingly, “Mattress Mack” will place a wager on his hometown Cougars, who are trying to reach the Final Four for the second consecutive year. He’s a businessman, not a professional sports bettor and his wagers – usually well over a million dollars – are tied in with promotions for his furniture stores in Texas.
He hadn’t decided his bets as of Friday afternoon, but was gearing up for a ride to Louisiana, the closest jurisdiction he can make a legalized sports wager.
With the game being played in San Antonio, Villanova should expect a hostile environment, no matter how well their fans travel.
“I was a little bit surprised that Houston’s favored,” McIngvale said. “[The TBS broadcasters] said the crowd was all Houston on Thursday, and that the Arizona coach turned around and tried to [invigorate] his fans on, but the Houston fans were drowning them out. That’s understandable given they’re 200 miles from us. It’ll probably be the same thing [Saturday].”
Saturday’s picks
6:09 p.m./TBS - 2-Villanova (+2) vs. 5-Houston (128)
South Region final at San Antonio
The last time Villanova was not favored was Feb. 22 when they were 2-point ‘dogs and lost at Connecticut, 71-69, for a push. They are 1-4 straight-up as underdogs, 1-3-1 against the spread. The pick: Houston laying 2.
8:39 p.m. approx./TBS - 2-Duke (4) vs. 4-Arkansas (146.5)
West Region Final at San Francisco
Arkansas is 219th in field goal shooting (43.4%), 328th in three-point accuracy (30.4%). Leading scorer JD Notae had 21 points on 29 shots in the win over Gonzaga. That kind of inefficiency won’t fly here. The pick: Duke -2, and under Arkansas team total of 71.5 points.
Thursday’s results
Went 3-0 with Villanova laying 5 to Michigan, Arkansas (+9.5) winning outright over Gonzaga, and Duke (+1) slipping past Texas Tech. Record for the tournament improved to 13-8 (61.9%).