Skip to content
Link copied to clipboard

Philly DA Larry Krasner argues that the courts should step in to block his impeachment trial

Krasner's lawyers urged Commonwealth Court judges to declare the ongoing impeachment drive legally baseless. Attorneys for the legislature said the process was constitutionally sound.

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner at a press conference in November.
Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner at a press conference in November.Read moreTom Gralish / Staff Photographer

Lawyers for Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner urged Commonwealth Court judges Thursday to declare the ongoing impeachment drive against him legally baseless, saying the Republican-led effort in Harrisburg was a dangerous attempt to remove a locally elected Democrat over ideological disagreements — and not impeachable conduct.

During a virtual hearing, Krasner’s attorneys called the impeachment effort a “profound distraction” for the city’s top prosecutor and his office, and said judicial intervention was required to halt what they view as a process marked by fundamental flaws. Krasner is scheduled to be tried by the state Senate next month.

“The stakes could not be greater,” said John S. Summers. What GOP lawmakers are seeking, Summers added, “is not only the erasure of votes and elections, but they are asking for a rule that says any time the majority party doesn’t like the policies of [another] party, we’ll go impeach the guy, and we can get a trial. ... That is a constitutional crisis. That is an invitation to chaos.”

» READ MORE: Philly’s gun violence remained at record levels for the third straight year

Lawyers for Republican legislative leaders took a different view, telling the judges that the House and Senate have acted within their constitutional authority in approving articles of impeachment against Krasner, and that the courts therefore don’t have a role in a process that remains ongoing.

“The courts have no jurisdiction in impeachment proceedings, and no control over their conduct, so long as actions are taken within constitutional lines,” said Lawrence F. Stengel.

The legal sparring was the latest development in the contentious impeachment effort. Republicans have accused the reform-oriented DA of enacting policies that have fueled the city’s shooting crisis and several other offenses.

Krasner has denied the allegations and said the case against him should be dismissed.

He filed suit in Commonwealth Court challenging the validity of the impeachment drive, and submitted a petition earlier this month asking judges to declare the proceedings unlawful. Beyond arguing that legislators had found no evidence of the “misbehavior in office” required for impeachment, his lawyers said the legislature lacks the authority to oust local officials, and were improperly stretching impeachment proceedings over two different legislative sessions.

Thursday’s hearing was an opportunity for judges to hear further argument on how or whether they might intervene. They did not make a ruling, or provide a timeline for when they might do so.

» READ MORE: Philly DA Larry Krasner has been impeached. Here’s what you should know.

Matthew Haverstick, an attorney for Senate Republicans, pushed back on two of Krasner’s arguments, saying the law makes clear that the legislature can stage impeachment across two sessions, and does have the power to impeach Philadelphia’s district attorney.

Commonwealth Court Judge Ellen Ceisler then said she thought the third issue raised by Krasner — that the allegations against him do not amount to impeachable conduct — was “the most troublesome aspect of this entire case.”

“It seems to me that these impeachment proceedings are based on disagreements with public policy and an elected officials’ discretion,” she said. “And I think that this proceeding could set terrible precedent in the future.”

Stengel replied that he believed it was the legislature’s role to evaluate the merits of the articles of impeachment, not the courts’ — particularly with the case pending trial, where he said Krasner would have a chance to mount a defense.

Krasner’s trial is expected to begin in Harrisburg on Jan. 18. Conviction and removal from office would require a two-thirds vote in the upper chamber on any of the seven articles filed against him.

Republicans were expected to hold 27 of 49 seats in the state Senate next year, five votes shy of the threshold needed for a vote to remove Krasner if every member is present.