Democracy dies if we drop the case of Trump, Egypt, and $10 million in cash

America’s founders were a little unclear about a lot of stuff — we’re still arguing after 233 years about just what the heck they were saying about guns in the Second Amendment — but they seemed very adamant about one idea.

Bribery is bad for democracy.

In fact, the impeachment clause of the U.S. Constitution spells out bribery as first on its list of things for which a corrupt president or other federal official can be removed from office, ahead of treason and other high crimes and misdemeanors. In case that was too ambiguous, the framers also wrote up the emoluments clause, using an anachronistic term to essentially bar the president and other officeholders from accepting gifts or payments from foreign countries or their rulers.

It seems pretty clear, yet over the course of the 21st century, something has gone awry. A corrupt U.S. Supreme Court, aided by a flawed system of criminal justice that gives every possible break to white-collar crooks while cracking down on the underprivileged, hasn’t quite legalized bribery but made it a lot easier to get away with. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton must be spinning in their graves over some of the recent developments.

The backsliding accelerated in the fateful political year of 2016 when SCOTUS threw out the corruption conviction of former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, who’d been lavished with gifts like Rolexes and a Ferrari from a businessman, with the justices insisting it wasn’t proved that the governor had done anything in return for such largesse. This undermined other federal bribery cases, but it got worse. This year, the high court — in a stunning 6-3 verdict — tossed out the corruption conviction of an Indiana mayor who took $13,000 from a company he’d just awarded a city contract because this seeming bribe was given after the fact.

I’m sure you’ll be shocked — shocked — to learn that two of the Supreme Court justices who voted to legalize a cut-and-dried form of bribery have been accused of improperly accepting gifts from billionaires with an interest in what happens at the nation’s highest court. In the most extreme case, Justice Clarence Thomas has been pegged with accepting a whopping $4 million-plus in luxury vacations, a relative’s private school tuition, and even an RV — much of it initially undisclosed. The response to these domestic emoluments has largely been institutional silence from a toothless Congress, a deer-in-the-headlights U.S. Justice Department, and his fellow justices who refuse to adopt a meaningful code of ethics.

At this point, one has to wonder: Where is rock bottom?

We may have just found it.

On Friday, the Washington Post broke a bombshell story about a credible allegation of bribery involving the 2016 election of Donald Trump, Egypt’s dictator Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, and a mysterious $10 million all-cash withdrawal from an Egyptian state-run bank just five days before Trump became president — and adopted a more friendly aid policy toward the Middle Eastern nation.

The rumors of such an investigation have kicked around for years — most famously in the latter days of Trump’s term, when part of a federal courthouse was closed off while prosecutors pushed for records from the Egyptian bank, although few details were known at the time. The new Post investigation revealed a stunning detail — that the Cairo bank had received a note from an agency believed to be Egyptian intelligence to “kindly withdraw” nearly $10 million in two, 100-pound bags full of U.S. $100 bills, five days before Trump became 45th president.

The case, which kicked off with a tip from a credible U.S. intelligence asset of a $10 million bribe from the Sisi regime to Trump to pay for a last-minute ad blitz in the 2016 campaign, remains a circumstantial one, lacking the smoking gun that could lie in Trump’s unexamined bank records. But what remarkable circumstances these are.

We know Trump — reluctantly, at the urging of aides — did inject $10 million into his campaign in its final days. The Post said a Trump campaign official later told the FBI the money was structured as a loan that could be repaid to Trump. We now know about the Egyptian withdrawal of nearly $10 million in American cash, in line with the intelligence tip. And we know Trump cozied up to Sisi — largely a U.S. pariah during the Obama administration — and even called him “my favorite dictator” before releasing nearly $1.4 billion in military aid to Egypt that had been held up because of its human rights abuses.

The missing link in the probe was Trump’s bank records, which might have shown receipt of $10 million. But, as the Post chronicled in great detail, the case was handed off in 2019 from the former special counsel, Robert Mueller, who’d chased the tip aggressively, to political appointees in then-Attorney General William Barr’s Justice Department, including Barr himself. The Trump appointees refused to go after Trump’s bank records from 2017 as he became president — even after the evidence of the Egyptian withdrawal that January. And President Joe Biden’s AG Merrick Garland, whose tenure has been marked by his political cowardice, didn’t restart the case before the statute of limitations expired in January 2022.

In many ways, the failed bribery probe is not an isolated incident. This is the third major case — in addition to the allegations of a Trump cover-up in Mueller’s probe of 2016 Russian election interference, and the 2016 hush money to Stormy Daniels that eventually led to Trump’s conviction on 34 state felony counts — in which Barr is alleged to have put his finger on the scales of justice in a case involving the president who appointed him. That alone is worthy of a congressional investigation.

» READ MORE: The giant U.S. scandal we don’t talk about | Will Bunch Newsletter

Meanwhile, the recent, commendable conviction of New Jersey Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez for accepting gold bars and cash bribes — tied to ... wait for it ... the government of Egypt — showed what happens when such cases can be brought before a jury of everyday Americans. But the Menendez case feels like the exception that proves the rule. Far too much blatant corruption — in both parties — that would have shocked the founders is met with a giant shrug.

I agree it was wrong and immoral (although probably not illegal in the current climate) when a Ukrainian energy company paid millions to the son of a then-vice president, Hunter Biden, for “expertise” he clearly did not have. I’d argue it looks far worse when a presidential son-in-law who became a White House aide heavily involved in Middle East policy leaves office with a $2 billion Saudi investment in his new fund (also, “expertise” he doesn’t really have) that means $80 million or so in fees. And yet, the Democrats who will investigate their own in Menendez or Hunter Biden have been shockingly weak in pursuing Jared Kushner’s Saudi Arabia dealings.

Before dropping out, President Biden kept telling us democracy is on the ballot in November. But what kind of democracy are we fighting for if bribery is becoming increasingly legal, or untouchable? The belief that everybody and everything is for sale in America has created a remarkable aura of cynicism that permeates our politics. One of the many ironies is that Trump, who may or may not have benefited from a $10 million bribe that makes the Watergate crimes of Richard Nixon look like jaywalking, also benefits from this nihilism, the notion that none of that jazz like facts or ethics actually matters.

And yet, the Post’s report of the most serious presidential bribery allegation in American history all but vanished from our wild political news cycle, like it fell between the cushions of JD Vance’s couch or whatever else we’re obsessing about on TikTok. It doesn’t have to be this way. If freedom is the new buzzword, America needs to be freed from bribery.

Do not let the matter of Trump, Egypt, and the $10 million disappear. Although it’s tragic the criminal statute of limitations expired, any alleged bribe can still be pursued as a civil case. More importantly, Congress — for now, that means the Democratic-controlled Senate — needs to open a full-blown investigation, with efforts to subpoena Barr and other Justice Department higher-ups to explain in public why the case was dropped.

What’s more, Democratic candidates running to retake control of both houses of Congress in 2025 need to pledge they will strengthen federal bribery laws in the face of these outrageous SCOTUS decisions. Kamala Harris should promise to appoint an attorney general who will make political corruption a top priority, and not just among Democrats.

The other wrinkle is the recent, abysmal Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity for so-called official acts that would have made Trump’s pro-Egypt policies — the quo in this alleged quid pro quo — off limits. The next Congress must pass legislation that spells out that a president is not above the law. Anyone can talk about making America great again, but that’s not really going to happen until we make bribery a crime again.

» READ MORE: SIGN UP: The Will Bunch Newsletter