Skip to content
Opinion
Link copied to clipboard
Link copied to clipboard

Attempts to keep Trump off the ballot were ludicrous. So are his claims of unchecked immunity.

If the U.S. Supreme Court supports Trump's immunity argument, what would stop Biden from settling the election right now with a drone strike on Mar-a-Lago?

The U.S. Supreme Court was right to rule that states may not unilaterally determine which presidential candidates are allowed on the ballot, writes Kyle Sammin. It will be just as correct when it strikes down Donald Trump's argument for total presidential immunity.
The U.S. Supreme Court was right to rule that states may not unilaterally determine which presidential candidates are allowed on the ballot, writes Kyle Sammin. It will be just as correct when it strikes down Donald Trump's argument for total presidential immunity.Read moreManuel Balce Ceneta / AP
    by Kyle Sammin | Columnist
    Published